Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Eur J Health Law ; 29(2): 240-259, 2022 03 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1752959

ABSTRACT

Ireland has been a leader in the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in the EU, with almost 80% of the eligible population (aged over 5 years) fully vaccinated at the time of writing. The success of the vaccine rollout in this jurisdiction notwithstanding, the legal frameworks supporting the rollout had significant lacunas. Two aspects in particular highlighted a lack of legal preparedness: the inadequacy of the legal framework for consent and the absence of a vaccine injury redress scheme. This paper explores these components of the COVID-19 vaccine rollout through the lens of legal preparedness. Whilst most often discussed in the context of command and control measures such as social distancing requirements and regional lockdowns, this paper argues for an expanded understanding of what it means to be legally prepared, highlighting the importance of the preparedness of domestic legal frameworks.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Ireland , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
2.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 71: 101602, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-610676

ABSTRACT

This article examines the changes made to mental health and capacity laws in Northern Ireland through temporary emergency legislation, known as the Coronavirus Act 2020. The purpose of the legislation was to respond to the emergency situation created by the COVID-19 pandemic, in particular the increase pressure placed on health services in the United Kingdom. An overview is provided of the government's rationale for the changes to Northern Ireland mental health and capacity laws, as well as exploring how they are likely to be operationalised in practice. Consideration is also given as to how such changes may impact upon existing human rights protections for persons assessed as lacking mental capacity. It is argued that it is important that regular parliamentary oversight is maintained in relation to the potential impact and consequences of such changes during the period they are in force. This should be done in order to assess whether they remain a necessary, proportionate and least restrictive response to the challenges faced in managing mental health and capacity issues in Northern Ireland during this public health emergency.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Mental Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence , Human Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Mental Competency/legislation & jurisprudence , Northern Ireland/epidemiology , Pandemics , Public Health/legislation & jurisprudence , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL